Stone Walls: The Legacy of New England Farm Heritage
(photos: Ms. Forsyth, Montpelier, VT)
Have you ever driven through your town and glanced into the woods, and thought... Where did those stone walls come from? To me--it is one of my absolute favorite "mysteries",that made me want to do some research over the years! They have a history that is unique to the agricultural past of our country, many of them have stood for well over 100 years!
Here is a poem I wrote about them a few years ago...
A Legacy of Stone
(N. Forsyth, 2013)
A legacy, which lives on to this very day,
Through the skeletons of stone based stockade,
A labor of sweat and toil across the New England brae,
Were how these fortifications were dutifully made.
From the till of their fields,
Surfaced this bounty of rocks,
Who’s main purpose was,
To protect the precious crops.
Who’s main purpose was,
To divide the land among men,
Who’s main purpose was,
To bring the animals browsing to an end.
Skillfully constructed,
They stood tall and obedient,
Here they still stand,
Patient and resilient.
Industrialization soon left these walls without intent,
Years of neglect, their purpose had reached its extent.
This very day, walking through the New England forests,
One may appreciate these legacies of agriculture left before us.
The History, Science & Poetry of New England Stone Walls
Source: https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/history-science-and-poetry-new-englands-stone-wallsDeforestation and Exhumation
Heating an average-sized New England farmhouse during the late 18th and early 19th centuries — which coincided with the waning years of the “Little Ice Age,” the unusually cool climatic period that lasted from the mid-1300s to the mid-1800s — required burning up to 35 cords of cut wood a year. Considering that one cord is 3.6 cubic meters of wood, it is easy to understand why New England’s cold winters, along with the construction of all those farm buildings, meant the demise of vast swaths of forest.
Widespread deforestation exposed New England’s soils to winter cold — scientists estimate winter was 1 to 1.5 degrees Celsius colder on average during the Little Ice Age than it is today — causing them to freeze deeper than they had before. This accelerated frost heaving, and gradually lifted billions of stones up through the layers of soil toward the surface.
These stones weren’t conducive to farming, so, aided by their oxen, farmers hauled the stones to the outer edges of pastures and tillage lands, typically unceremoniously dumping them in piles that delineated their fields from the forest. (Some of these so-called “dumped walls” would later be relaid more intentionally when improved tools and equipment made rebuilding easier.) In the early days, artistry in stone wall building had to wait. The first priority was survival, which meant clearing land to grow crops and raise livestock.
The types of stones and their abundance may have been familiar to those early farmers, who were mainly from the British Isles, Thorson says, because rock in New England is similar to rock in England and Scotland. England and New England have similar natural landscapes because both lands have a similar geologic history. Millions of years ago, England and New England were formed within the same mountain range near the center of Pangaea. So, he says, “the similar fieldstones on opposite sides of the Atlantic were created practically within the same foundry.”
But there was one important difference between these New World and Old World stones: Britain had long been deforested, with its subterranean stones brought to the surface, so its stone walls had been constructed hundreds, if not thousands, of years earlier.
Monumental Effort
Although the oldest documented stone wall in New England dates to 1607 — made by English settlers of the Virginia Company along the estuary of the Kennebec River north of Portland, Maine — most of the region’s stone walls were built in the Revolutionary period between 1775 and 1825, a period that Thorson calls “the golden age of stone wall building.” By then, the effects of deforestation on the soil were being fully felt; established farms were churning up tons of stones that had to be removed. Simultaneously, a post-Revolutionary War baby boom provided an abundance of young hands to help move them.
During this period, thousands of stone walls were built and thousands more were improved. Thorson writes in “Stone by Stone” that “farmers throughout the region began to look inward at their farms, not as safe havens from war, but out of pride in being American.” Their pride was reflected in the way they painstakingly refashioned the piles of stone and primitive dumped walls along their property lines into the now classical “double walls,” parallel rows of stone filled in with small stones (see sidebar, page 34).
Constructing the walls was labor intensive. For comparison, modern masons typically lay about 6 meters of stone wall per day, Thorson says. He estimates that 40 million “man days” of labor would have been required to build the more than 380,000 kilometers of stone walls in New England — enough to build a wall from Earth to the moon — reported by an 1871 fencing census. “This is an awesome amount of manual labor,” he says, “but it is trivial when compared to the much larger effort of getting stones to the edges of the fields in the first place. That job usually had been done stone by stone, and load by load, by the previous generation.”
Over a couple of generations, New England’s vast stone wall network was erected, and by the 1830s to 1840s, farms were also well established and farmers were no longer clearing as much land, said Christie Higginbottom, a research historian at Old Sturbridge Village, in the documentary “Passages of Time.” Old Sturbridge Village is a living museum of 1830s rural New England life located in Sturbridge, Mass.
As the 19th century progressed, changes in farming, in the nature of work, and in the political climate in the country all profoundly affected New England’s stone walls.
The Industrial Revolution and the Decline of Farms
Farming was ubiquitous in Colonial America. Generations of subsistence farmers cleared and wrung their families’ nourishment from the land. Shortly after the Revolutionary War, however, that began to change. The establishment in 1787 of America’s first cotton mill — the Beverly Cotton Manufactory in Beverly, Mass. — launched one of the greatest transformations and population shifts in the young nation’s history. The American Industrial Revolution brought to New England’s cities thousands of young women and girls, in particular, who left behind their cooking, spinning, weaving and various other farm chores to earn money for their families as hired laborers in the region’s proliferating textile mills.
Farming itself was also changing dramatically with the invention of new tools, such as the cast-iron plow, and a more scientific approach to farming that maintained the soil’s fertility. Even these tools couldn’t help farmers recover from the so-called “Year Without a Summer” in 1816, when the massive eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia in 1815 ejected ash and particulates into the global atmosphere, causing a “volcanic winter” that devastated crops. Between the loss of a year’s harvest and the start of an industrial depression in 1819, many more New Englanders abandoned their farms — and with them, the stone walls — to push westward into New York, Ohio and beyond
By mid-century, the exodus from the farms caused what Thorson calls a “psychological curtain” to descend upon the land and a “biological curtain” to arise, as vegetation overgrew many neglected old walls. “If you walk away from walls in an open landscape,” if there are no cows to keep fields mowed, he says, “the walls are going to get covered with brush very quickly and they’re going to disappear. The white pines are going to shoot up. Within a decade of walking away from them, you’re going to have trouble seeing them.”
Reclaiming and Romancing the Stone
As early as 1850, naturalist Henry David Thoreau revealed in his journal how the rural stone walls had already come to represent something important about the character of New England. “We are never prepared to believe that our ancestors lifted large stones or built thick walls,” he wrote. “How can their work be so visible and permanent and themselves so transient? When I see a stone which it must have taken many yoke of oxen to move, lying in a bank wall ... I am curiously surprised, because it suggests an energy and force of which we have no memorials.”
During the Colonial Revival of the early 20th century, Americans — particularly those well-off enough to reimagine the nation’s past as a series of idealized Currier and Ives lithographs — began to collect artifacts of that past, such as old farm tools, and to reconstruct early villages. People refurbished rural stone walls on properties that had been abandoned generations earlier.
It was American Poet Laureate Robert Frost, perhaps more than anyone else, who imbued New England’s stone walls with mythological significance. Frost’s poetry helped solidify the heroic, all-American image of the Yankee farmer — independent, self-reliant and resilient — standing up, defiantly, to the relentless stone. Thorson says that for Frost, “stone walls were more than symbols. They were oracles.”
Through Frost and other writers and artists, Thorson says, New England “learned to love its stone walls more as memorials to a lost world than they had ever been loved as fences.” And with the growing appreciation of America’s heritage came an increasing understanding of the walls as actual ruins of early American civilization and the awesome human achievement they represent, he says.
A March 2014 study in the Journal of Archaeological Science offers a fascinating glimpse of what lies beneath the forests that now envelop many New England farms abandoned in the latter half of the 19th century.
Using a laser mapping technique called lidar that can see landscapes even through dense forest cover, University of Connecticut geographers Katharine Johnson and William Ouimet conducted aerial surveys of the heavily forested areas of three southern New England towns. The researchers found remnants of a former “agropolis,” vast networks of roads and stone walls that have been hidden for more than a century beneath the dense cover of oak and spruce trees.
Between lidar’s ability to pull back the biological curtain of the forest and Frost’s pulling back the psychological curtain drawn against the pain of abandonment, Thorson muses, it would seem that science and poetry together finally “allow us to actually see things that everyone knew were there all along.”
Through his work with the Stone Wall Initiative at the Connecticut State Museum of Natural History, Thorson says he intends to ensure that stone walls — New England’s iconic landform — will continue to be seen by many generations to come.
Reading the walls
What distinguishes a New England stone wall from a pile of stones? Noted stone wall expert Robert M. Thorson, a geologist at the University of Connecticut, considers a stone wall to be “any continuous row of large stones or stack of smaller ones that is more than four times as long as it is wide.” Anything shorter, he says, “is a cluster or pile of stones, not a wall.”
Most of the walls we find today in New England — on active farms or trailing off into overgrown forests — were built to divide fields, separating animals and crops, but each wall is unique, Thorson says, and classifying them requires distinguishing their function and structure.
Stone Type
Regional differences in the type and color of stone used in walls usually don’t reflect cultural differences, but are simply indicative of the type of stone available in the area and the purpose of the wall. As the most common rock in New England, granite was also the most popular stone for wall building, but gneiss and limestone were also used. Most of the estimated 380,000 kilometers of stone walls that had been built in New England by the end of the 19th century were made of fieldstone — the generic term for rocks found lying in a field.
Height
Most New England stone walls are only as tall as the average man’s thigh, which, Thorson explains, “was governed more by the ergonomics of lifting and tossing stone than by the mandate of fencing.” Laws in Colonial America required a farm fence to be 1.2 to 1.5 meters high. Because most stone walls did not reach this height, farmers added wooden rails on top to help pen in animals. Owners of shorter fences forfeited the right to recover compensation from another farmer whose animal crossed the fence and caused damage.
Structure
Stone walls typically are either the “single” type, built to surround pastures, or sturdier “double” walls, parallel rows of stone that lean toward each other or have a center trough filled with small stones.
Other types of walls can be classified according to the degree of care and detail with which they were built. Unlike “dumped walls,” which are simply rows of piled stones, “tossed walls,” in which the stones were stacked loosely like firewood, reflect the attention that went into building them. Most old New England walls are tossed. Those requiring the most effort include orderly “laid walls,” in which stones fit into a “weave”; “mosaic walls” featuring different sizes and shades of stone arranged in a geometric pattern; and “copestone walls,” distinguished by a top tier of stone laid on edge rather than flat.
Walls could be mortared, known as “wet walls,” or unmortared, known as “drystone walls.” The latter proved more durable because chemical reactions between the mortar lime and the fieldstone can weaken wet walls, making them less resistant to tree roots and more prone to crumble.
For more information, visit the Stone Wall Initiative at stonewall.uconn.edu.
No comments:
Post a Comment